ncloud_drm_enable_site

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false, already covering the safety profile. The description adds minimal extra context ('activate' as a synonym) but no additional behavioral details such as effects on site status or logs. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, focused sentence with no redundant wording. Every word contributes to conveying the action and object.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple state-change action with one parameter and helpful annotations, the description is adequate but not richly detailed. It omits return value expectations or preconditions, but given the tool's simplicity and annotation coverage, this is a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (siteId with 'Site ID to enable'), so the description does not need to explain parameters. The tool description adds no further semantic value beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Enable (activate)' with a clear resource 'DRM site', immediately conveying the tool's function. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like ncloud_drm_disable_site and ncloud_drm_update_site by its focus on activation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage (enable a DRM site) but provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or conditions. It is not misleading, but lacks explicit context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.