ncloud_ses_upgrade_version

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the burden of behavioral disclosure. It mentions 'upgrade' implying mutation, but it fails to state any side effects, destructive potential, required permissions, or whether the operation is safe to repeat. Minimal transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, front-loaded with the verb and resource. There is zero wasted content, making it highly efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutating operation with no output schema and no annotations, the description is thin. It lacks context about how to obtain the target version code, whether a precheck is recommended, and what the upgrade entails. More context is needed for an agent to safely invoke this tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema covers 100% of the parameters with clear descriptions ('Cluster instance number', 'Target version code'), so the schema does the heavy lifting. The description adds nothing about how to find valid version codes or the relationship between parameters, which is acceptable but not enhanced.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear action ('Upgrade Search Engine version') and the target resource ('a cluster'). It's specific enough to distinguish from other SES tools like precheck or progress, though it doesn't explicitly differentiate from similar upgrade tools on other services.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, no prerequisites, and no mention of preconditions like running precheck or checking progress. The description is purely a one-liner without context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.