ncloud_delete_certificate

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds meaningful behavioral context beyond the destructiveHint annotation: it emphasizes permanence, requires confirm=true for execution, and warns about dependencies on Load Balancer, CDN+, and Global Edge. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three concise sentences, each serving a distinct purpose: warning of destructiveness, stating the safety precondition, and specifying the confirmation flag. No fluff or redundant content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete operation with full schema coverage and no output schema, the description covers the essential aspects: what is deleted, permanence, dependency check, and confirmation requirement. It could mention success/error behavior, but that is not critical for a destructive action.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema already documents all three parameters with clear descriptions (100% coverage). The description reinforces the confirm=true requirement but does not add significant semantic value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Permanently delete a registered certificate') and identifies the resource type. It distinguishes from sibling tools like ncloud_pca_delete_ca by specifying 'registered certificate' and referencing Load Balancer, CDN+, and Global Edge dependencies.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage context (delete when you have an unneeded certificate) and provides a precondition (ensure not in use). However, it does not explicitly contrast with alternatives or state when not to use this tool, leaving usage guidance only implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.