ncloud_list_file_plugins

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The readOnlyHint annotation already marks this as a safe read operation. The description adds behavioral context by specifying 'full list', implying no filtering and complete results. It also identifies the cloud service context ('Cloud Insight'), which is not present in the tool name. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single 12-word sentence that directly states the purpose without superfluous information. It is front-loaded and every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, read-only listing tool with a readOnlyHint annotation, the description is complete. It clearly identifies the resource and scope. Without an output schema, the description still conveys that a complete list is returned. No additional context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so there are no parameter semantics to explain. The schema coverage is 100% vacuously, and the description's 'full list' reinforces that no filters are needed. Baseline 4 is appropriate for a parameterless tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get'), the resource ('full list of Cloud Insight file monitoring plugins'), and the scope ('full list'). It is specific enough to distinguish from sibling tools like ncloud_list_process_plugins and ncloud_list_port_plugins, which target different plugin categories.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage: call this to retrieve all file monitoring plugins. However, it does not explicitly mention when to use this over alternatives (e.g., ncloud_get_file_plugin for a single plugin) or note any exclusions. For a simple list tool this is acceptable, but the guidance is not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.