ncloud_create_init_script

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotation destructiveHint=false is the only behavioral signal, and the description adds no additional context such as what the tool returns, whether it requires specific permissions, or any side effects. For a creation tool, the lack of disclosure beyond the annotation is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that names the verb and resource directly. It contains no unnecessary words or repetition, making it highly concise and well-structured for a simple CRUD operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool creates a resource and has four parameters, the description is too sparse. It does not mention return values, whether the operation is synchronous, or any constraints beyond what the schema already provides. The combination of description, schema, and annotations is only minimally adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides 100% coverage with descriptions for all four parameters, so the baseline is 3. The description itself adds no further parameter meaning, but the schema adequately documents each parameter, including the required initScriptContent and the allowed values for osTypeCode.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Create') and the resource ('init script'), matching the tool's name. It is unambiguous, but it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like ncloud_list_init_scripts or ncloud_delete_init_scripts, though the name itself implies the distinction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no context about whether this is the appropriate tool for a given scenario. It only states what it does, not when or why to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.