ncloud_search_events

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds minimal behavioral context beyond the readOnlyHint annotation. It does not disclose pagination behavior, default page size, time range constraints, return format, or any other side effects or operational nuances. The phrase 'with filtering options' is generic and does not provide practical insight into how the tool behaves.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that efficiently conveys the core purpose. It is front-loaded with the action and resource, and every word contributes to the meaning. There is no fluff or repetition of schema details, making it appropriately sized for a tool description.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 7 parameters, required startTime/endTime, no output schema, and only a readOnlyHint annotation, the description is too sparse. It does not mention required time range, pagination, event severity levels, or any operational context. The schema covers parameter names but not the overall behavior or constraints (e.g., maximum date range, how filtering options combine). The description fails to fill in these gaps, leaving the tool under-specified for an agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides complete descriptions for all 7 parameters with 100% coverage, so the baseline is 3. The description's mention of 'filtering options' is redundant and does not add any extra meaning beyond the schema. It does not clarify parameter interactions, default values beyond what the schema states (e.g., pageNum default 1, pageSize default 20), or value formats, but the schema already handles these adequately.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the tool's function: 'Search and get monitoring events from Cloud Insight with filtering options.' It specifies a verb ('search and get'), a resource ('monitoring events'), and a source ('Cloud Insight'). It does not explicitly distinguish from sibling tools like ncloud_search_event_by_id or ncloud_search_event_count, but the plural 'events' and the mention of filtering implies a list operation, making it reasonably distinct.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of exclusions, prerequisites, or comparisons to sibling tools like ncloud_search_event_by_id, ncloud_search_event_count, or the various ncloud_list_*_events tools. The description simply states the action without contextualizing it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.