Skip to main content
Glama
oliverames

YNAB MCP Server

Execute YNAB Tool

ynab_tool_execute
Read-onlyIdempotent

Execute a read-only YNAB MCP tool by name. Use the index to find tool names, then pass the tool name and optional JSON input.

Instructions

Execute an existing read-only YNAB MCP tool by name. Use ynab_tool_index first to discover YNAB tool names, then pass the selected tool_name and its JSON input. Write-capable tools must be called directly or through ynab_write_tool_execute when YNAB_ALLOW_WRITES=1.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
inputNoJSON input for the selected YNAB tool. Omit or pass an empty object for tools that take no input.
tool_nameYesExisting read-only YNAB tool name, such as review_unapproved, get_transactions, list_categories, search_categories, or search_payees.

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
resultYesStructured result returned by Execute YNAB Tool.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, idempotentHint, destructiveHint. Description adds context about write tools and the need for YNAB_ALLOW_WRITES=1, which is valuable behavioral information beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with no wasted words. Information is front-loaded: first sentence states core purpose, second adds usage guidance.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the existence of an output schema (not shown but indicated), the description is complete. It covers how to discover tools, how to call them, and write tool alternatives. The tool is a generic executor, so no need to list siblings.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, but description adds useful guidance: 'Omit or pass an empty object for tools that take no input.' This supplements the schema's description of the input parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the action ('execute'), the resource ('read-only YNAB MCP tool'), and distinguishes from write tools. It also mentions the prerequisite tool ynab_tool_index.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines5/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly advises to use ynab_tool_index first for discovery, and specifies that write tools must use a different pathway (ynab_write_tool_execute). Provides clear when-to-use and when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/oliverames/ynab-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server