list_builds
Lists all tracked builds with their status, showing which are running and which are finished.
Instructions
List all tracked builds (running and finished) with status summary.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Lists all tracked builds with their status, showing which are running and which are finished.
List all tracked builds (running and finished) with status summary.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided; description merely states the action without disclosing behavioral traits like pagination, ordering, or data freshness.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with 12 words, front-loaded with action verb, no unnecessary information.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Simple tool with no params and no output schema; description is adequate for a list operation but could mention return format.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. Description adds no parameter info, which is acceptable; baseline is 4.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Clear verb+resource: 'List all tracked builds (running and finished) with status summary.' Distinguishes from sibling 'build_status' which likely shows status of a single build.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implied usage for getting an overview of all builds, but no explicit when-to-use or alternatives provided.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lcapossio/fpgaZeroMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server