Skip to main content
Glama
iseppo

e-arveldaja MCP Server

by iseppo

Update Transaction

update_transaction
Idempotent

Update transaction metadata including bank reference, counterparty name, and payment reference for accurate financial records.

Instructions

Update transaction metadata fields such as bank reference, counterparty name, bank account number, description, or payment reference.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesTransaction ID
dataYesObject with allowed metadata fields only: bank_ref_number, bank_account_name, bank_account_no, description, ref_number.
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=false and idempotentHint=true. The description adds no additional behavioral context such as authorization needs, side effects, or limitations beyond what the annotations imply.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence with no unnecessary words. Direct and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple metadata-update tool, the description is adequate but lacks explicit statements about which fields are updatable and that other fields are not. Could be more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with both parameters described. The description adds natural language examples of metadata fields, slightly enhancing understanding but not significantly adding beyond the schema's allowed fields list.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action 'update' and the resource 'transaction metadata fields', with examples. It distinguishes from sibling tools like confirm_transaction or delete_transaction.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like update_purchase_invoice or other update tools. The context of when to update metadata vs other actions is missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/iseppo/e-arveldaja-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server