Reactivate Product
reactivate_productReactivate a deactivated product by providing its object ID to restore active status.
Instructions
Reactivate a deactivated product
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Object ID |
reactivate_productReactivate a deactivated product by providing its object ID to restore active status.
Reactivate a deactivated product
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Object ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Annotations already indicate idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false. The description adds no additional behavioral context (e.g., what happens if product is already active, or permissions required).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, non-redundant sentence that conveys the core purpose with zero waste.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple activation tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate. It could mention the idempotent behavior, but is otherwise complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with a single 'id' parameter described as 'Object ID'. The description adds no further meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb ('Reactivate') and resource ('a deactivated product'), clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'deactivate_product' and other product actions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives, or any prerequisites. The tool name implies the product must be deactivated first, but this is not stated.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/iseppo/e-arveldaja-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server