Skip to main content
Glama
iseppo

e-arveldaja MCP Server

by iseppo
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to e-arveldaja MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • e-conomic MCP Server

      klausagnoletti
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language management of e-conomic accounting, including customers, products, and invoices, with full CRUD and PDF download capabilities.
      17
      3
      MIT

    • merit-aktiva-mcp

      roosa-dev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes ~60 tools for the Merit Aktiva accounting API, covering sales/purchase invoices, payments, customers, vendors, items, general ledger, offers, reference data, and reports with both read and write operations.
      10 npm
      MIT

    • fiken-mcp

      gronnmann
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage invoices, contacts, purchases, journal entries, and other accounting operations via the Fiken API.
      100
      14 npm
      6
      MIT

    • Lexware Office MCP Server

      jonasley
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and draft accounting documents such as invoices, vouchers, contacts, and articles via the Lexware Office API, including PDF rendering and receipt uploads. Supports OAuth and static token authentication for secure access.
      MIT

    • QuickFile MCP Server

      marcusquinn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with QuickFile UK accounting software, providing access to invoicing, client management, purchases, banking, and financial reporting through 40+ tools covering the complete QuickFile API.
      58 npm
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.1/5.0

    Scored across 129 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct resource+action pairs (e.g. get_client vs update_client vs delete_client), but several workflow/reconciliation tools overlap heavily: reconcile_inter_account_transfers duplicates modes of reconcile_bank_transactions, while classify_bank_transactions, analyze_unconfirmed_transactions, accounting_inbox, recommend_workflow, and continue_accounting_workflow all cover adjacent 'next step' guidance and can be hard to tell apart. The detailed descriptions mitigate the confusion but do not eliminate it.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The overwhelming majority follow a clear snake_case verb_noun pattern (list_accounts, create_purchase_invoice, compute_trial_balance, invalidate_journal). A minority are noun-based merged entry points (accounting_inbox, receipt_batch, month_end_close_checklist, lightyear_portfolio_summary), which are readable but slightly break the verb-first convention.

    Tool Count1/5

    129 tools is an extreme overload for any server, dwarfing even generous accounting-suite scopes. Even with detailed descriptions, an agent faces severe selection cost and many tools are specialized variants or merged entry points that could have been consolidated.

    Completeness5/5

    The surface covers full CRUD/lifecycle for clients, products, invoices, journals, transactions, bank accounts, and invoice series, plus reporting (balance sheet, P&L, trial balance, aging), VAT checks, year-end close, document management, reconciliation, and Wise/CAMT/Lightyear integrations. No obvious domain gap remains that would cause an agent dead end.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources