Skip to main content
Glama
e-arveldaja MCP Server

e-arveldaja MCP Server

by iseppo

Related Servers

Alternatives to e-arveldaja MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language management of e-conomic accounting, including customers, products, and invoices, with full CRUD and PDF download capabilities.
      17
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes ~60 tools for the Merit Aktiva accounting API, covering sales/purchase invoices, payments, customers, vendors, items, general ledger, offers, reference data, and reports with both read and write operations.
      13 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage invoices, contacts, purchases, journal entries, and other accounting operations via the Fiken API.
      100
      22 npm
      7
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and draft accounting documents such as invoices, vouchers, contacts, and articles via the Lexware Office API, including PDF rendering and receipt uploads. Supports OAuth and static token authentication for secure access.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with QuickFile UK accounting software, providing access to invoicing, client management, purchases, banking, and financial reporting through 40+ tools covering the complete QuickFile API.
      22 npm
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3/5.0

    Scored across 130 tools

    Disambiguation3/5

    Most tools target distinct resources or actions, but the 130-tool surface creates many near-neighbors (e.g. accounting_inbox vs recommend_workflow vs continue_accounting_workflow, and several reconcile/classify/analyze tools). Detailed descriptions help, but merged entry points with modes and multiple workflow helpers make misselection plausible.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The set overwhelmingly uses snake_case and predictable verb_noun naming (list_clients, get_journal, create_sale_invoice, delete_product, confirm_transaction). There are minor deviations such as receipt_batch, accounting_inbox, month_end_close_checklist, and lightyear_portfolio_summary, but they remain readable and consistent enough.

    Tool Count1/5

    At 130 tools this is far beyond a well-scoped surface, even for a broad accounting system. The volume creates significant cognitive and selection load, and many capabilities are split across overlapping workflow/helper tools rather than consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    Coverage is extensive: clients, products, invoices, journals, transactions, bank reconciliation, reports, tax, year-end, Lightyear/Wise/CAMT imports, documents, credentials, and audit logs. There are minor gaps such as read-only project/reference-data tools (e.g. list_projects only), but core accounting lifecycles are covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessOutdated data