Skip to main content
Glama
iseppo

e-arveldaja MCP Server

by iseppo
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to e-arveldaja MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • e-conomic MCP Server

      klausagnoletti
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables natural language management of e-conomic accounting, including customers, products, and invoices, with full CRUD and PDF download capabilities.
      17
      3
      MIT

    • merit-aktiva-mcp

      roosa-dev
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes ~60 tools for the Merit Aktiva accounting API, covering sales/purchase invoices, payments, customers, vendors, items, general ledger, offers, reference data, and reports with both read and write operations.
      12 npm
      MIT

    • fiken-mcp

      gronnmann
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to manage invoices, contacts, purchases, journal entries, and other accounting operations via the Fiken API.
      100
      19 npm
      2
      MIT

    • Lexware Office MCP Server

      jonasley
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to read and draft accounting documents such as invoices, vouchers, contacts, and articles via the Lexware Office API, including PDF rendering and receipt uploads. Supports OAuth and static token authentication for secure access.
      MIT

    • QuickFile MCP Server

      marcusquinn
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to interact with QuickFile UK accounting software, providing access to invoicing, client management, purchases, banking, and financial reporting through 40+ tools covering the complete QuickFile API.
      11 npm
      4
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    C2.9/5.0

    Scored across 130 tools

    Disambiguation2/5

    Many tools have overlapping purposes: create_purchase_invoice_from_pdf vs create_purchase_invoice vs extract_pdf_invoice vs validate_invoice_data; multiple merged entry points (receipt_batch, process_camt053, accounting_inbox, reconcile_bank_transactions, classify_bank_transactions) blur boundaries. Several compute_* tools (compute_trial_balance, compute_profit_and_loss, compute_balance_sheet, compute_account_balance, compute_account_dimension_balances, compute_client_debt) are distinct but similar enough to cause misselection.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Most tools follow verb_noun snake_case (list_clients, create_journal, confirm_sale_invoice), but there are deviations: get_sale_invoice_document vs get_document, compute_* vs calculate-like semantics, and merged entry points with mode parameters (receipt_batch, process_camt053, accounting_inbox) break the pattern. Some names are vague (suggest_booking, recommend_workflow, continue_accounting_workflow).

    Tool Count1/5

    130 tools is far beyond the well-scoped range and creates an extreme mismatch for an accounting server. Even a complex domain like Estonian accounting does not justify this many entry points; many tools are variations or merged wrappers that could be consolidated.

    Completeness4/5

    The domain is well covered: clients, products, invoices (purchase/sale), journals, transactions, bank accounts, series, documents, VAT, reports, year-end close, dividends, Lightyear imports, CAMT, and audit logs. Minor gaps exist (e.g., no explicit sale invoice PDF email resend beyond send_sale_invoice, no direct purchase invoice payment matching beyond reconciliation), but the surface is comprehensive.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessWithin a week

    Resources