Skip to main content
Glama
iseppo

e-arveldaja MCP Server

by iseppo

Reconcile Currency Rounding

reconcile_currency_rounding
Idempotent

Correct small currency rounding residuals on partially paid purchase invoices. Preview fixes with dry run, apply with execute flag.

Instructions

Reconcile small PARTIALLY_PAID purchase-invoice currency residuals. DRY RUN by default; execute=true applies in-place fixes for <0.10 EUR or FX journals for 0.10-1.00 EUR.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
executeNoApply the proposed fixes (default false = dry run)
max_candidatesNoLimit to first N PARTIALLY_PAID invoices
fx_gain_account_idNoAccount for FX gains (diff > 0, paid less than booked) — default: auto-detect combined "Kasum/kahjum valuutakursi muutustest" (standard 8500)
fx_loss_account_idNoAccount for FX losses (diff < 0, paid more than booked) — default: same combined FX account as gains (standard 8500)
liability_accounts_idNoDeprecated compatibility assertion. When supplied, it must match the invoice liability account; it never overrides or supplies that account.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Adds value beyond annotations by explaining the dry run default and the specific fix ranges for residuals, without contradicting annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences with no filler, front-loading the core purpose and key behavior.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Adequately explains the tool's behavior for a moderate-complexity tool with no output schema, though the dry run return could be more explicit.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the description adds minimal extra meaning beyond the schema, which already documents each parameter well.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it reconciles small PARTIALLY_PAID purchase-invoice currency residuals, distinguishing it from sibling reconciliation tools like reconcile_bank_transactions.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides guidance on dry run vs execute mode and the amount thresholds for fixes, but does not explicitly state when not to use or list alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/iseppo/e-arveldaja-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server