retrieve_single_activity

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Lacking annotations, the description only states the basic retrieval action. It does not disclose error handling for missing IDs, authentication requirements, or any rate limits. While the operation is simple, the absence of behavioral details reduces transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no redundant words. However, the unnecessary phrase 'from a specified Storyblok space' introduces ambiguity without adding value, slightly reducing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read operation with one parameter and no output schema, the description provides basic context. However, it omits the space parameter, error behavior, and return format, making it less complete than ideal for an agent to use confidently.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 100% coverage on the single parameter, and the description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. The tool description's reference to 'specified Storyblok space' is not reflected in the parameters, causing slight confusion. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'retrieves' and the resource 'activity log by its ID from a specified Storyblok space'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like 'retrieve_multiple_activities' by specifying a single activity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives or any prerequisites. The mention of 'specified Storyblok space' is ambiguous since the space ID is not an input parameter, and there is no context on required permissions or typical use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.