retrieve_multiple_discussions

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only lists parameters and repeats schema defaults, without adding context about read-only nature, authentication requirements, rate limits, or consequences of usage. The description fails to convey any behavioral traits beyond the obvious retrieval operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is appropriately sized and front-loaded with the main purpose. It uses a bullet list for parameters, which is efficient. However, the parameter descriptions are almost verbatim from the schema, slightly redundant. Overall, it is concise with minimal waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (pagination with filters), the description covers the essential aspects: story ID, pagination, and status filter. No output schema exists, but for a list retrieval tool, the description is fairly complete. It could mention the return format or limits, but it's adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description adds no additional meaning or context beyond what is in the schema. Baseline of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves multiple discussions for a specific story, using a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like retrieve_specific_discussion and retrieve_my_discussions by specifying the scope (for a story and paginated).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for paginated retrieval by story ID, but does not explicitly state when to use this tool over alternatives (e.g., retrieve_specific_discussion for a single discussion, retrieve_my_discussions for user-scoped discussions). No 'when not to use' guidance is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.