get_asset
Retrieve a specific asset from Storyblok by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Gets a specific asset by ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ID of the asset to retrieve |
Retrieve a specific asset from Storyblok by providing its unique ID.
Gets a specific asset by ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ID of the asset to retrieve |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so description carries burden. It describes a read operation, which is transparent, but adds no behavioral context beyond the obvious (no permissions, side effects, or response format).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no fluff, every word is necessary. Well front-loaded.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a simple single-resource retrieval tool. Could mention return format, but it's not critical given no nested objects or output schema.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, and the description adds no additional meaning beyond the parameter descriptions already present in the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states 'Gets a specific asset by ID' with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like fetch_assets or get_story.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implicitly clear that this is for retrieving a single asset by ID, but no explicit guidance on when not to use or mention of alternatives like fetch_assets for multiple assets.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/hypescale/storyblok-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server