bulk_create_stories

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It only states 'Creates multiple stories' without addressing atomicity, partial failure, rate limits, or return values. This is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that conveys the core purpose without any fluff. It is front-loaded with the action and object, achieving maximum efficiency.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a bulk operation with one parameter array, no output schema, and no annotations, the description lacks crucial completeness. It omits details like maximum batch size, error handling behavior, return format, or idempotency, which could lead to misuse.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, with all parameters described in the input schema. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate. No enhancement beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Creates multiple stories in Storyblok' uses a specific verb 'creates' and clearly identifies the resource (multiple stories) and context (Storyblok). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'create_story' for single story creation and 'bulk_update_stories' for updates.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'create_story' for individual stories, or any mention of prerequisites, batch size limits, or trade-offs. The agent receives no context to decide between bulk and single creation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.