unarchive_decoration_preset

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full behavioral burden. It mentions the effect of restoring to default listings and the Kiln Pro requirement, but omits permissions, irreversibility, error conditions, and what happens if the preset is not archived.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The functional sentence is useful and front-loaded, but most of the remaining text is promotional copy and an upgrade URL. The 'Everything in Free...' line does not help an agent invoke the tool and distracts from the required action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description does not provide enough context about permissions, side effects, or the preset_id parameter. It is sufficient to identify the action but not to call it confidently in all cases.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There is one required parameter, preset_id, with 0% schema description coverage. The description implies that the ID refers to a previously-archived decoration preset, but adds no format, constraints, or selection guidance beyond that inference.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The first sentence states a specific verb and resource: restore a previously-archived decoration preset to default listings. It clearly identifies the object as a decoration preset, distinguishing it from sibling tools for designs or features.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase 'previously-archived decoration preset' implies the tool should be used only when a preset is archived, and 'Requires Kiln Pro' adds a prerequisite. However, there are no explicit alternatives, exclusions, or guidance about when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.