Skip to main content
Glama

get_design

Read-only

Retrieve a single design's summary and branch list to populate the workshop detail view and support branch/version navigation.

Instructions

Fetch a single design's summary + branch list for the workshop detail view.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "design_id": "<design_id>"
    },
    "name": "get_design"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
design_idYesDirectory slug under ``~/.kiln/designs``.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.5.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / design_id / description
      Added value: +"Directory slug under ``~/.kiln/designs``."
  2. Addedv1.5.0

TDQS

A3.6/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already establish that this is a read-only, non-destructive, closed-world operation. The description adds useful behavioral context by stating that the result includes a summary plus a branch list, but it does not cover error behavior, permissions, or pagination.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single front-loaded sentence with no wasted wording. It states the action, the returned content, and the intended view context efficiently.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple one-parameter read tool with annotations and no output schema, the description is largely complete: it identifies the resource and the returned summary and branch list. It could be slightly stronger by clarifying how it differs from related design-inspection tools, but no critical information is missing.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the single design_id parameter is already documented as a directory slug under ~/.kiln/designs. The description does not add meaning beyond the schema, so the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb and resource: fetch a single design, returning its summary and branch list. It clearly scopes the tool to one design rather than a list, but it does not explicitly distinguish itself from nearby siblings such as get_public_design, inspect_design, or get_design_source.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The phrase "for the workshop detail view" gives an implied usage context, so an agent can infer this is for populating a design detail screen. However, it provides no explicit when-to-use guidance, exclusions, or named alternatives for related design-fetching tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools