Skip to main content
Glama

cloud_remote_list

Read-only

Lists all registered Kiln Cloud remotes so you can see which cloud printers are available to your agent. Requires Kiln Pro.

Instructions

List all registered Kiln Cloud remotes.

Needs Kiln Pro.

Tool call template

This tool declares no required parameters. Add optional parameters from the input schema as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {},
    "name": "cloud_remote_list"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Addedv1.5.0

TDQS

A3.7/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description's contribution is the Kiln Pro entitlement gate, which is genuinely useful behavioral context. It says nothing about what happens with zero remotes, ordering, or result size, which limits it to a 3.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences: the action first, then the entitlement constraint. Nothing is padded or redundant.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter read tool with full annotation coverage and no output schema, purpose plus entitlement is nearly enough. The remaining gap is the absence of any hint about how a "remote" relates to the branch/release listing siblings, which would help an agent chain calls correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool takes zero parameters, so there is nothing for the description to disambiguate and the baseline of 4 applies. The description adds no misleading parameter claims.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Names a specific verb and resource ("List all registered Kiln Cloud remotes") with clear scope. It does not explicitly differentiate itself from close siblings such as cloud_list_remote_branches or cloud_list_remote_releases, so an agent must infer that this returns remotes rather than their branches or releases.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

"Needs Kiln Pro" gives a real prerequisite, which helps an agent decide whether the call can succeed. However, there is no explicit when-to-use guidance and no mention of the alternatives (cloud_list_remote_branches, cloud_list_remote_releases) that an agent should pick when it wants branch- or release-level data.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools