Skip to main content
Glama

cloud_list_remote_branches

Read-only

Lists remote branches for a specified design ID, so you can view available branches on a registered remote before syncing or comparing versions.

Instructions

List branches on the remote for design_id.

Needs Kiln Pro.

Tool call template

Replace each placeholder with a value matching the input schema. Only required parameters are included; add optional parameters as needed.

{
  "id": 1,
  "jsonrpc": "2.0",
  "method": "tools/call",
  "params": {
    "arguments": {
      "design_id": "<design_id>"
    },
    "name": "cloud_list_remote_branches"
  }
}

Input Schema

NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
remoteNoRemote alias, as registered with ``cloud_remote_add`` (default: ``"default"``). Default: "default".
design_idYesThe design whose remote branches to list.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed2 schema fields changedv1.5.1
    • addedInput schema / properties / design_id / description
      Added value: +"The design whose remote branches to list."
    • changedInput schema / properties / remote / description
      Previous value: -"Default: \"default\"."New value: +"Remote alias, as registered with ``cloud_remote_add`` (default: ``\"default\"``). Default: \"default\"."
  2. Addedv1.5.0

TDQS

B3.4/5.0
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, and openWorldHint=false, so the safety profile is covered. The description adds the Kiln Pro entitlement requirement, which is genuinely new information not in the annotations, but says nothing about the return contents, ordering, or pagination of the branch list.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two short sentences with the operation stated first and the entitlement constraint second; nothing is wasted. It is on the terse side, arguably leaving the 'remote' parameter unmentioned, but no filler or redundancy is present.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

This is a simple two-parameter read tool with a complete schema and full annotation coverage, so the basics are satisfied. What is missing is the relationship to the related listing tools and any hint about the shape of the branch list returned, which would round out an otherwise minimal definition.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so both 'remote' (alias registered via cloud_remote_add, default 'default') and 'design_id' are fully documented in the schema. The description only echoes design_id and gestures at 'the remote' without adding format or default details beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('List branches on the remote') scoped to a design_id, which is enough to separate it from a generic 'list' tool. It does not name any sibling such as cloud_remote_list or list_design_branches, so the differentiation is left to inference.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

'Needs Kiln Pro' is a useful gating condition that tells the agent when the call is viable. However, there is no guidance on when to pick this versus cloud_remote_list or the local branch listers, and no mention of what prerequisite state (remote configured/registered) must exist.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools