cloud_sync_status
Check the current status of cloud synchronization for 3D printing jobs and files.
Instructions
Get the current cloud sync status.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Check the current status of cloud synchronization for 3D printing jobs and files.
Get the current cloud sync status.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description bears full burden. It only states 'Get', implying read-only, but does not disclose whether it triggers side effects, returns cached data, or requires authentication.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence with no wasted words. It efficiently communicates the tool's purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a zero-parameter tool, the description is adequate but lacks detail on what 'status' entails (e.g., sync progress, last sync time). No output schema to compensate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0 parameters and 100% schema coverage, the baseline is 4. The description adds no parameter info, but none is needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the verb 'Get' and the resource 'current cloud sync status', distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'cloud_sync_configure' and 'cloud_sync_now'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as checking status before initiating a sync. No context on prerequisites or ideal scenarios.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/codeofaxel/kiln'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server