stop_watch_print

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses basic behavior (signals exit, removes from registry) but misses important details such as whether the operation is idempotent, what happens if the watcher ID is invalid, or any required permissions. With no annotations, the burden is on the description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with two sentences. The main action is front-loaded, and every sentence adds value with no repetition or fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple lifecycle tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description provides adequate purpose and parameter context, but lacks details on return state format and idempotency, leaving some ambiguity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema provides no description for the 'watch_id' parameter (0% coverage). The description adds context by specifying that it is the ID returned by 'watch_print', but does not elaborate on format or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool stops a background print watcher and returns its final state. It mentions the key resource (watcher) and action (stop), distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'watch_print' which starts a watcher.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies this tool is used after starting a watcher with 'watch_print', but it does not explicitly state when to use it, nor does it contrast with alternatives or mention any preconditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.