create_print_service_order

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It mentions returning a quote but does not describe side effects (e.g., order persistence, resource reservation), authentication requirements, rate limits, or potential destructiveness. The word 'create' implies mutation, but no safety details are given.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is structured with a clear first line stating purpose, a usage note, and a clean Args list. It is appropriately sized for 10 parameters and front-loaded, though slightly verbose in the Args section.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description only vaguely mentions 'returns a quote with local and fulfillment options.' Missing details on output format, error handling, and prerequisites. Completeness is adequate but not thorough for a 10-parameter tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description carries full burden. It explains all 10 parameters, including defaults for material, quantity, prefer_local, and lists example intents (strong, pretty, cheap). This adds significant meaning beyond the bare schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a Print-as-a-Service order and returns a quote. It specifies the mutually exclusive inputs (model_path, model_url, or prompt) and includes a reference to a sibling tool (print_service_quote) for confirmation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides some usage guidance (require one of three inputs, call print_service_quote to confirm) but does not explicitly state when not to use this tool or compare with other siblings like print_service_status or cancel_print_service_order.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.