resume_print

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It describes the effect: 'return the nozzle to its previous position and continue extruding.' This is helpful but does not mention potential errors, safety implications, or what happens if the printer is not paused. For a simple 0-param tool, this is adequate but not rich.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, no wasted words. The first sentence states the purpose clearly, and the second adds necessary behavioral context. Front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (0 params, no output schema), the description covers the main effect and precondition. However, it lacks information about failure cases (e.g., what if the printer is not paused) or confirmation of success. It is minimally complete but could include more context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and the input schema covers 100% of the (nonexistent) parameters. The description adds no parameter info because there are none. Baseline for 0 params is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the verb 'resume a paused print job', specifying the resource (print job) and scope (paused state). It clearly distinguishes from siblings like pause_print and cancel_print.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a clear condition: 'The printer must currently be in a paused state.' This tells the agent when to use the tool. It lacks explicit mention of when not to use it, but the condition implies the alternative. No alternative tools are named, but the sibling list includes pause_print.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.