get_safety_profile

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description carries full burden. It discloses the fallback behavior if printer_id is not found, which is a key behavioral trait. It also lists the returned data, providing transparency for a read operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is front-loaded with purpose and returns. The parameter documentation in a code block is somewhat structured but takes extra lines. Overall, it is concise and clear with minimal waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with one parameter, no annotations, and no output schema, the description covers purpose, returns, fallback, and parameter details. It is fairly complete, though it could mention that it is a read operation explicitly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The only parameter 'printer_id' is described with examples ('ender3', 'bambu_x1c', 'prusa_mk4') and a clear explanation, adding significant meaning beyond the schema which only provides type and title.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool gets the full safety profile for a specific printer model. It lists specific returned data (temperature limits, feedrate limits, etc.) and distinguishes itself from siblings like 'list_safety_profiles' and 'export_safety_profile'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives. It implies use when needing safety info for a specific printer, but no guidance on when to use sibling tools like 'list_safety_profiles' or 'export_safety_profile'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.