skylight_list_frames
Retrieve all Skylight family hubs linked to your account to manage events, lists, and settings.
Instructions
List Skylight frames (family hubs) on this account.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve all Skylight family hubs linked to your account to manage events, lists, and settings.
List Skylight frames (family hubs) on this account.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description states this is a list operation on the account, implying read-only behavior, but provides no details on authentication, rate limits, or output format. With no annotations, more transparency would be beneficial.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single 10-word sentence with no unnecessary words. It is perfectly concise and front-loaded with the key action and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the tool has no parameters and no output schema, the description adequately states what it does (list frames) and the scope (on this account). It could mention result format but is sufficient for a simple listing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has no parameters, and schema description coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to add param details. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate as it adds no extra meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description uses a specific verb 'List' with resource 'Skylight frames (family hubs)', clearly distinguishing from sibling tools like skylight_get_frame (retrieve a single frame) and skylight_update_frame (modify). The inclusion of '(family hubs)' adds clarifying context.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description does not provide any guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as skylight_get_frame for a specific frame. No when-not or usage context is given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chrischall/skylight-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server