skylight_get_recipe
Retrieve a specific meal recipe using its ID. Obtain detailed recipe information from your Skylight Calendar.
Instructions
Get one meal recipe.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| frameId | No |
Retrieve a specific meal recipe using its ID. Obtain detailed recipe information from your Skylight Calendar.
Get one meal recipe.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| frameId | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description lacks any disclosure of behavioral traits like read-only nature, side effects, or permission requirements. Since no annotations are provided, the description carries the full burden, but it only states the action and resource without any behavioral context.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (4 words) but at the cost of omitting essential information. It fails to earn its place by not providing enough context for an agent to use the tool effectively.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema, annotations, and parameter descriptions, the description is highly incomplete. For a simple getter tool, at least the expected output or identifier usage should be mentioned. The current description minimally fulfills the basic function.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the tool description does not explain the meaning or usage of the 'id' or 'frameId' parameters. The description adds no value beyond the schema's structural definition.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get one meal recipe' clearly indicates the action (get) and the resource (meal recipe), distinguishing it from sibling tools like skylight_list_recipes (list all) and skylight_create_recipe (create). However, it does not explicitly state that the retrieval is by ID, which slightly reduces clarity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as when to use a list or create tool. No context about prerequisites or typical use cases is given.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chrischall/skylight-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server