skylight_get_auto_creation_intent

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided. The description only states it is a 'Get' operation, which implies read-only, but does not disclose any behavioral traits such as permissions, side effects, rate limits, or error conditions. With no annotations, the description should provide this context but fails to do so.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, to the point, and front-loaded with the key information. Could be slightly improved by adding parameter hints, but overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is incomplete for a tool with two parameters and no output schema or annotations. It does not specify the return value format, the purpose of the optional frameId parameter, or any usage constraints. Given the tool's role in the auto-creation flow, more detail is needed for correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must explain parameters. It does not mention what 'id' refers to (the intent ID?) or what 'frameId' is used for. The description adds no meaning beyond the schema, leaving the agent uninformed about required and optional inputs.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Get'), the resource ('AI auto-creation intent'), and what is returned ('its status + draft results'). This distinguishes it from sibling tools like list (which retrieves multiple intents) and approve/undo (which mutate).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives. It does not mention that it retrieves a single intent by ID (implied by 'id' parameter), nor does it contrast with list_auto_creation_intents or other related tools. The agent lacks context for proper selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.