skylight_delete_album
Delete a photo album from Skylight Calendar by ID. Removes the album and its photos from the device.
Instructions
Delete a photo album.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| frameId | No |
Delete a photo album from Skylight Calendar by ID. Removes the album and its photos from the device.
Delete a photo album.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| frameId | No |
Changes observed during successful MCP inspections. Dates show when Glama detected each change.
v0.7.1Input schema / properties / id / anyOfRemoved value: -[
- {
- "type": "string"
- },
- {
- "type": "number"
- }
-]Input schema / properties / id / typeAdded value: +[
+ "string",
+ "number"
+]v0.4.6Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral consequences, but it only says 'Delete a photo album.' It does not mention irreversibility, whether photos inside the album are also deleted, ownership/permission requirements, or any side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, direct sentence with no wasted words. It is appropriately front-loaded and easy to parse.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with 2 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is too sparse. It fails to clarify the meaning of required parameters or the consequences of deleting an album, leaving important context for the agent missing.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0% and the description does not explain the 'id' or 'frameId' parameters. An agent cannot determine what ID is expected or why frameId might be needed.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete a photo album.' clearly states the specific action (delete) and resource (photo album). It is easily distinguished from sibling tools that delete other resource types.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as skylight_remove_from_album or skylight_update_album. It does not state exclusions, prerequisites, or when not to use it.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chrischall/skylight-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server