skylight_get_calendar
Retrieve a specific calendar account by its ID. Use this to access event details and manage schedules.
Instructions
Get one calendar account.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| frameId | No |
Retrieve a specific calendar account by its ID. Use this to access event details and manage schedules.
Get one calendar account.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| frameId | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states 'Get one calendar account' without disclosing behavioral traits such as read-only nature, return format, side effects, permissions, or error conditions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence with no superfluous words. However, it sacrifices necessary detail for brevity, making it adequate but not well-structured for agent comprehension.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The tool has 2 parameters, no output schema, and no annotations. The description fails to explain return values, usage context, parameter formats, or any constraints. It is severely incomplete for agent decision-making.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. The description adds no meaning to the parameters ('id' and 'frameId') beyond their names. The agent receives no guidance on what values to provide or how they affect the tool's behavior.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Get one calendar account.' clearly specifies the action (get) and the resource (one calendar account). It is distinct from sibling tools like 'skylight_list_calendars' which lists all calendars, though it does not explicitly differentiate.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as 'skylight_list_calendars' or 'skylight_create_source_calendar'. The description does not mention prerequisites, context, or exclusivity.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chrischall/skylight-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server