skylight_get_calendar

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description is consistent with the readOnlyHint annotation, but it adds no behavioral context beyond what the annotation already provides. It does not mention required identifiers, frame scoping, error behavior, or what happens when the calendar account is not found.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short and front-loaded, with no redundant wording. However, it is so minimal that it misses opportunities to add useful routing or parameter context without becoming verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read tool with no output schema, some gaps are understandable, but the description still omits what a calendar account is, what frameId means, and what kind of response to expect. An agent can guess that 'id' is required but cannot fully understand the invocation context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain either parameter. The 'id' parameter can be loosely inferred as the calendar account identifier from the phrase 'one calendar account', but 'frameId' is completely unexplained, and the description fails to compensate for the missing schema descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Get') and a singular resource ('one calendar account'), which distinguishes it from sibling list_calendars. However, it leaves some ambiguity around what exactly constitutes a 'calendar account' versus a calendar or source calendar.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance about when to use this tool instead of alternatives such as skylight_list_calendars or skylight_update_calendar. The only hint is the word 'one', which is too implicit to be considered clear usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.