skylight_list_auto_creation_items

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must disclose behavioral traits. It mentions the tool lists 'draft items' but does not explain required parameters, output format, permissions, or side effects. The description adds minimal behavioral context beyond the basic listing action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence of 26 words, concise and front-loaded with the core action. The parenthetical adds useful examples, though 'the general draft reader' is slightly jargon-like. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 0% schema coverage, no output schema, and no annotations, the description should provide more context. It explains purpose and distinguishes from siblings but omits parameter explanations, return value details, and usage prerequisites. The tool is not fully specified for an agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage, and the description does not explain the parameters 'id' or 'frameId' at all. It fails to add meaning beyond the schema, leaving agent unable to understand what values to provide.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists 'draft items an AI intent created,' identifies specific examples (meal sittings, activities, list items), and distinguishes it from an 'event-only draft list.' This makes the purpose specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides context by mentioning what the tool covers (general drafts beyond events) and contrasts it with an 'event-only draft list,' implying when to use this tool over alternatives. However, it does not explicitly name the sibling tool for event-only drafts or provide when-not-to-use guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.