skylight_create_album

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of disclosure. It only states the basic action without revealing any behavioral traits such as side effects (e.g., notifications, frame assignment) or permissions required. This is insufficient for a mutation tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely brief, but it sacrifices necessary detail. It is not front-loaded with critical information; instead, it merely restates the tool's name. Conciseness should not come at the cost of completeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, two unannotated parameters, and a simple operation, the description is incomplete. It does not explain return values, error cases, or any side effects. For a tool that modifies state, more context is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the purpose or constraints of the two parameters (title, frameId). It adds no meaning beyond the raw schema, leaving agents unaware of what values are acceptable or how they affect the album.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Create a photo album' clearly states the verb and resource, indicating that this tool creates an album. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like skylight_add_to_album or skylight_update_album, which involve albums but serve different purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., skylight_add_to_album for adding photos to an existing album). No context about prerequisites or usage scenarios is given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.