skylight_add_to_album

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false and openWorldHint=true, so the basic safety profile is covered. The description adds nothing further: it doesn't say whether adding is idempotent, whether it applies to multiple albums at once, or what happens with duplicate membership.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single short sentence with no padding or wasted words, but it is under-specified rather than genuinely concise for a mutating tool with three parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no output schema, 0% schema coverage, an undocumented frameId, and only minimal annotations, the description leaves too much for the agent to infer about required context and side effects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must carry the burden. It only loosely implies album_ids and message_ids; the required frameId parameter is never mentioned, and there is no info on accepted ID formats (string or number) or batching behavior.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (add) and both the resources being moved (messages/photos) and the destination (albums), which distinguishes it from siblings like skylight_remove_from_album and skylight_create_album. The mention of 'photos' is slightly misleading since the schema only accepts message_ids and album_ids.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this versus skylight_remove_from_album, skylight_copy_messages_to_frames, or skylight_create_album. No prerequisites, constraints, or conditions are stated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.