skylight_complete_chore
Mark a chore as completed by specifying its ID, with an optional frame ID for context.
Instructions
Mark a chore complete.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| frameId | No |
Mark a chore as completed by specifying its ID, with an optional frame ID for context.
Mark a chore complete.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | ||
| frameId | No |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of disclosing behavioral traits. It fails to mention whether the action is idempotent, reversible, or requires specific permissions, leaving critical gaps for a mutation tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single short sentence, but it sacrifices essential information for brevity. While concise, it is underspecified and does not earn its place as a complete description.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of annotations, output schema, and parameter documentation, the description is entirely incomplete. The agent cannot determine preconditions, effects, or return values from this description alone.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the two parameters ('id' and 'frameId'). The agent receives no guidance on their meaning or usage, which is severely inadequate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Mark a chore complete' uses a clear verb and resource, effectively stating the tool's core action. However, it does not differentiate from the sibling tool 'skylight_complete_chore_instance', which may have a similar purpose.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'skylight_complete_chore_instance' or 'skylight_uncomplete_chore'. Usage context is entirely implied by the tool name.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/chrischall/skylight-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server