WPForms Einträge abrufen

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden, but it only states the action. It does not disclose pagination behavior, response format, or that entries are tied to a specific formId. The schema hints at pagination via page/perPage, but the description offers no behavioral detail beyond the bare action.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise and front-loaded, containing only the essential action. While it is not bloated, its brevity leaves out useful context that would make it more informative. It is appropriately sized for a simple tool but could be slightly richer.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations, output schema, and the sparse description, the agent cannot infer what a successful response looks like or how the parameters affect the results. The schema provides defaults, but the overall behavior and return structure remain unspecified, making this incomplete for a tool with this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with all three parameters described (page, formId, perPage). The description adds no additional meaning beyond what the schema provides, so the baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Ruft Formular-Einträge ab' clearly states a retrieval action targeting form entries, which is specific and unambiguous. However, it does not distinguish this tool from siblings like wpforms_list_forms or gf_get_entries, so an agent might not immediately know it is WPForms-specific and entry-focused.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There is no mention of how it relates to wpforms_list_forms (for listing forms) or other form plugins' entry tools, leaving the agent without selection criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.