Hole Elementor Widget

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It only says 'get details' without clarifying read-only status, what details are included, error conditions, or any side effects. This is minimal for a tool with no safety annotation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single concise and front-loaded sentence in German. It communicates the action and resource without unnecessary words, making it easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is a simple getter with an output schema, so return values need not be described. However, the description omits the fact that postId is also required, which could mislead agents into thinking only widgetId is needed. Overall, it is minimally sufficient but lacks important contextual detail.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema fully describes both parameters (postId and widgetId) with 100% coverage. The description adds little beyond 'by its ID', which aligns with widgetId but omits the required postId. Baseline 3 is appropriate when schema covers parameter meaning.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Hole' = get), the resource ('Details eines Elementor-Widgets'), and the identifier ('anhand seiner ID'). It is specific enough to distinguish from sibling tools like elementor_get_global_settings or elementor_list_widgets.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the use case (retrieve widget details by ID) but does not explicitly state when to use it over alternatives or any exclusions. There is no mention of alternative tools or prerequisites, so guidance is only implicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.