Hole Responsive-Einstellungen

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only indicates a read operation ('Holt'), but fails to disclose any behavioral nuances such as whether Elementor must be active, how settings are merged, or potential edge cases. This is minimal transparency beyond the obvious.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that efficiently conveys the action and scope. Every word contributes meaning, with no filler or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that this is a zero-parameter getter with no output schema, the description covers the core purpose adequately. Minor gaps remain: it does not mention the structure of the response or behavior if Elementor is missing, but the simplicity of the tool makes this acceptable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline score of 4 applies. The schema already documents everything (100% coverage), and the description adds no parameter details because none are needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific action ('Holt' = fetches) and a specific resource (all responsive/breakpoint settings from theme and Elementor). This differentiates it from siblings like elementor_get_breakpoints by explicitly covering both theme and Elementor sources, making the purpose unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage by stating what it retrieves, but it provides no explicit guidance on when to choose this tool over alternatives (e.g., elementor_get_breakpoints for Elementor-only settings) and no exclusions. The context is clear but guidance is absent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.