Hole Elementor Breakpoints

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description carries the full burden. It only states the retrieval action ('Holt') but does not disclose return format, potential errors, or any side effects. Since it is a getter, the read-only nature is implied, but no additional behavioral traits are revealed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is front-loaded with the verb and object. It is concise and contains no filler or redundant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter, read-only tool, the description is largely sufficient. It could mention the response shape or confirm that all breakpoints are returned, but the operation is simple enough that this is a minor gap. The examples 'Mobile, Tablet, etc.' add useful context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, so baseline 4 applies. The description correctly does not introduce any parameter syntax or requirements, which is appropriate for a parameterless tool.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb 'Holt' (gets) and identifies the exact resource 'Responsive Breakpoints (Mobile, Tablet, etc.)'. This clearly distinguishes it from sibling tools like elementor_get_global_settings or elementor_list_kits. Minor typo in title ('Hole') does not obscure the meaning.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, exclusions, or compare with other Elementor settings tools. The usage context is entirely implicit from the tool name.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.