Multilingual Plugin erkennen

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says it detects the plugin without explaining whether it is read-only, what it returns, whether it caches results, or what side effects (if any) occur. For a detection tool this is likely safe, but the description does not explicitly say so.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, compact sentence ('Erkennt welches Multilingual-Plugin installiert ist') that is front-loaded and to the point. Every word earns its place with no padding or irrelevant detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given there is no output schema, the description should explain what a successful detection returns (e.g., plugin slug, display name, or version). It also does not mention which multilingual plugins are covered (WPML, Polylang, TranslatePress). This leaves crucial information missing for an agent to understand the tool's full behavior.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are zero parameters, so the baseline is 4 per instructions. The description adds no parameter details because none exist. The schema is empty and the description's omission is acceptable.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('Erkennt' / detects) and a clear resource (which multilingual plugin is installed). It distinguishes from sibling multilingual tools like wpml_list_languages or polylang_list_languages by focusing on plugin detection rather than language operations. However, it remains somewhat vague about the output (e.g., plugin name vs. boolean), which prevents a perfect score.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not mention using it before wpml_* or polylang_* tools, nor does it exclude situations like 'when the plugin is unknown.' The context of use is only implied by the tool's purpose.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.