Formular-Plugin erkennen

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description lacks behavioral detail beyond the basic action. It does not disclose whether the operation is read-only, what output format to expect (e.g., plugin slug, name), or any limitations. With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden and is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence in German, efficiently stating the tool's purpose. No unnecessary words or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description is too brief for a tool with no output schema. It does not specify what the tool returns (e.g., plugin slug/name) or which form plugins are detectable. This leaves a significant gap in understandability, especially given the lack of structured output documentation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, and the input schema is empty, providing 100% coverage. With no parameters to document, the description could add nothing further; the baseline score of 4 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool detects which form plugin is installed. It uses a specific verb ('Erkennt') and resource ('welches Formular-Plugin installiert ist'), which distinguishes it from sibling tools that operate on specific form plugins (e.g., gf_list_forms, wpforms_get_entries).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as ml_detect_plugin or form-plugin-specific tools. The use case is only implied by the tool name and description, with no explicit exclusions or instructions on how to proceed after detection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.