Kommentar Details abrufen

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits, but it only gives a brief action without details such as read-only nature, auth requirements, error behavior, or return format. The term 'ruft Details ab' implies a safe read but does not explicitly state it.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that is direct and free of filler. It immediately conveys the core purpose without unnecessary detail, making it highly concise and well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple single-comment fetch with one parameter, the description covers the basic purpose. However, it lacks guidance on expected output, error cases, or usage context, which would help an agent fully understand the tool's behavior. Given low complexity, this is adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with the parameter 'commentId' described as 'Kommentar-ID'. The description adds no extra semantic meaning beyond the schema, so baseline of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Ruft Details eines einzelnen Kommentars ab' clearly states the tool's function: retrieving details of a single comment. This is a specific verb+resource combination that distinguishes it from siblings like comment_list (lists comments) and comment_update (modifies comments). The resource is uniquely identified, leaving no ambiguity about what the tool does.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. The description does not mention when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any exclusions or prerequisites. It simply states the action without context on selection criteria.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.