Permalink-Struktur abrufen

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only says 'retrieves the current permalink structure' — implying a read operation but providing no details on permissions, return format, caching, or side effects. This is minimal and does not add meaningful behavioral context beyond the title.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no unnecessary words. It is concise and well-structured. However, it adds only the word 'current' beyond the title, so it does not significantly enrich the tool's documentation, though it remains appropriately sized for a zero-parameter getter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is simple but lacks contextual detail. It tells us the tool retrieves the permalink structure but does not describe the return value's format, structure, or any relevant caveats. This is a minimum viable description but leaves gaps for an agent needing to interpret the output.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has zero parameters, so the baseline score is 4. The description does not need to explain parameters, and the empty input schema aligns with this. No additional parameter-specific semantics are required or provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves the current permalink structure, using a specific verb ('ruft ab' = retrieves) and a clear resource ('Permalink-Struktur'). It effectively distinguishes this tool from siblings like admin_get_settings or wp_get_site_info by referring specifically to permalink structure.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. The description simply states what the tool does without indicating when to use it versus alternatives, prerequisites, or any context about typical use cases. This is a 'no guidance' case.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.