Versandzonen auflisten

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden for behavioral disclosure. It states that the tool returns all shipping zones and their methods, which is a clear behavioral trait. The word 'listet' implies a read-only operation, but it does not explicitly state that no modifications are made. However, for a parameterless list tool, this is reasonably transparent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that front-loads the verb and resource. There is no unnecessary information, making it highly efficient and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a parameterless list tool, the description adequately covers the operation's scope: it lists all shipping zones and their methods. It does not detail the exact data structure or any sorting, but given the tool's simplicity and lack of parameters, it is nearly complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool accepts zero parameters, and the schema description coverage is 100% by default. The description's use of 'alle' (all) clarifies that no filtering is possible, adding semantic value beyond the empty schema. This aligns with the baseline 4 for zero-parameter tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool lists all shipping zones and their methods, using the specific verb 'listet' (lists) and the resource 'Versandzonen und deren Methoden' (shipping zones and their methods). This distinguishes it from sibling tools by specifying the unique resource being listed.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when you need to retrieve shipping zones, but it does not provide explicit when-to-use guidance or mention alternative tools. For a simple list operation, the context is implied rather than fully articulated.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.