Application Password erstellen

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the action (creates) and the purpose (API access), but does not disclose side effects such as the password being shown only once, permission requirements, or whether it is irreversible. This is a significant gap for a credential-creating tool.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that delivers the essential information without wasted words. It is appropriately concise for a simple creation operation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Although the tool is simple and the schema covers parameters, there is no output schema and no annotations. The description omits crucial context such as what the function returns (e.g., the generated password or a success message) and any security implications. The agent would be left uncertain about the operational outcome.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no extra parameter meaning beyond what the schema already provides (name, appId, userId). All parameters are adequately described in the schema itself.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Erstellt ein neues Application Password für API-Zugriff' uses a specific verb (erstellt) and resource (Application Password), clearly distinguishing it from siblings like 'admin_list_app_passwords' and 'admin_delete_app_password'. It also adds the purpose 'für API-Zugriff', making the tool's role unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description does not mention prerequisites, exclusions, or why one would choose this over listing or deleting app passwords. The context is minimal and implied.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.