Zeige häufige Widget-Konfigurationen

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full responsibility. It only says the tool 'shows' example configurations, implying read-only, but does not disclose output specifics, error behavior, or any side effects. The minimal detail limits transparency.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence that directly states the tool's purpose. It is well-structured and free of unnecessary detail.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of annotations and the existence of many sibling Elementor tools, the description is too sparse to provide complete operational context. It does not explain what an 'example configuration' consists of, how results are structured (though an output schema exists), or when to choose this over similar tools.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The single parameter widgetType is thoroughly covered by the schema with an enum and description, achieving 100% coverage. The tool description adds a general context of 'common' widgets but does not further explain parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the function with a specific verb ('Zeigt' = shows) and resource ('Beispielkonfigurationen für häufig verwendete Elementor Widgets'). It distinguishes from siblings by emphasizing 'common' configurations, though it could more explicitly contrast with tools like elementor_get_widget.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no preferred scenarios, and no exclusions. It only states the basic function, leaving the agent to infer usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.