Import Starter Feeds

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It discloses that already subscribed feeds are skipped and a subset are pinned for the morning briefing, but does not mention whether the operation is reversible, any permission needs, or side effects like rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two sentences, 25 words, front-loaded with the main action. Every sentence adds value: first states purpose, second adds behavioral details (skipping, pinning). No redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with no parameters and no output schema, the description covers the key aspects: what the tool does, what it skips, and what happens afterwards. It could mention that the list is predefined and not configurable, but overall it is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are no parameters, and schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to add parameter details, and the baseline for 0 parameters is 4. The description is consistent with the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool imports a curated starter feed list covering multiple topics, and distinguishes itself from sibling tools like subscribe_feed (individual subscriptions) and refresh_feeds (updating existing). The verb 'import' and resource 'starter feed list' are specific.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies use for initial setup (starter feed list) but lacks explicit guidance on when to use versus alternatives or when not to use. No mention of prerequisites or context like 'use when setting up a new account'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.