Skip to main content
Glama
Mipiti
by Mipiti

edit_trust_boundary

Update a trust boundary's attributes like description, allowed attack vectors, or isolation flag in a threat model. Changes create a new model version to reflect revised security boundaries.

Instructions

Edit a trust boundary. Creates a new model version.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
tb_idYesID of the trust boundary (e.g., "TB1").
passesNoNew comma-separated AttackVector values the boundary allows through (subset of "Network,Adjacent,Local,Physical"). Use the empty string to set "blocks all"; omit to leave unchanged. Reach-relevant — narrowing or widening this set can flip CO verdicts.
sealedNoNew isolation flag. True declares NO lateral ingress (the only way in is crossing the perimeter — an air-gap / segmented enclave), which lets reachability decisively rule the boundary unreachable; False assumes a lateral pivot is possible. Reach-relevant — changing it can flip CO verdicts. Omit to leave unchanged.
crossesNoNew comma-separated asset IDs.
model_idYesID of the threat model.
descriptionNoNew description.
change_reasonNoRequired when ``passes`` or ``sealed`` actually changes. Captured in the audit trail; documents why the boundary's vector filter was tightened/widened or its isolation claim changed.
server_versionYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description discloses the important side effect of creating a new model version, but lacks details on destructiveness, authorization requirements, or immediate impacts. With no annotations, the description carries the full burden, which it only partially fulfills.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely concise at one sentence plus a fragment, with no wasted words. However, it could be better structured by listing side effects or important notes.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite the complexity of the tool (8 parameters, important side effect), the description is minimal. It does not cover return values, parameter roles beyond schema, or when specific parameters are required. An output schema exists but is not referenced.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 88%, so most parameters are already described in the schema. The description adds no additional parameter meaning beyond stating the tool's general purpose, resulting in a baseline score of 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the verb ('Edit') and resource ('trust boundary'), and mentions the side effect of creating a new model version. However, it does not distinguish from sibling tools like 'add_trust_boundary' or 'remove_trust_boundary'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No prerequisites or conditions are mentioned, leaving the agent to infer appropriate usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Mipiti/mipiti-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server