Skip to main content
Glama
Mipiti
by Mipiti

add_trust_boundary

Add a trust boundary to define a security zone in a threat model. Specify assets crossing the boundary and attack vectors allowed through, with optional sealing for air-gapped enclaves.

Instructions

Add a trust boundary. Creates a new model version.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
passesNoOptional comma-separated AttackVector values the boundary allows through (subset of "Network,Adjacent,Local,Physical"). Omit for the methodology default (passes-everything). Narrowing this set is what makes a boundary block specific attacker vectors in the deterministic reachability composer.
sealedNoOptional. Set True to declare the boundary has NO lateral ingress — the only way into its zone is crossing the perimeter (an air-gap / network-segmented enclave). A sealed boundary that blocks the attacker's vector lets reachability decisively rule the asset unreachable instead of indeterminate. Default False (assume a lateral pivot is possible). Set it only when the isolation is real and attestable.
crossesNoOptional comma-separated asset IDs that cross this boundary.
model_idYesID of the threat model.
descriptionYesWhat this boundary represents (e.g., "Public network to API server").
server_versionYes

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Without annotations, the description must disclose all behavioral traits. It mentions the side effect of creating a new model version but does not describe any destructive actions, required permissions, or other behaviors such as whether the operation can be undone.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very short (two sentences) but could be improved by adding more context without becoming verbose. It is front-loaded with the main action, but the brevity sacrifices informativeness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a tool with 6 parameters and a domain-specific concept (trust boundary), the description lacks sufficient context. It does not explain what a trust boundary is, how it relates to the model version, or what the output schema contains. An output schema exists but is not shown, so the description carries responsibility for completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has high description coverage (83%), so the baseline is 3. The tool description itself adds no parameter-specific information beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool adds a trust boundary and notes the side effect of creating a new model version. However, it does not differentiate from similar tools like edit_trust_boundary beyond the verb 'add', and the term 'trust boundary' is not defined.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives (e.g., edit_trust_boundary, remove_trust_boundary). There is no mention of prerequisites or context for its use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/Mipiti/mipiti-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server