Aribot MCPofficial
A
licenseNot graded
qualityD
maintenanceEnables security work such as threat modeling, scanning, compliance checks, and remediation through AI assistants using the Model Context Protocol.
MIT
Mipiti MCP Server
by Mipiti
Related Servers
Alternatives to Mipiti MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI coding providers to run structured multi-agent workflows through MCP, including tracked tasks, document specs, handoffs, health gates, and audit evidence.29 npmMIT
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with the SCF Controls Platform for security compliance, including browsing controls, tracking implementation, managing evidence, assessing risks, and monitoring vendors via natural language.224534 npm3MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-powered threat modeling with tools for creating threat models, analyzing security threats, generating security controls, and validating architecture against best practices.-
Break Anythingofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceConnects AI coding agents to security tooling so they can inspect authorized code, dependencies, container images, and infrastructure, confirm exploitability, and receive evidence-backed remediation plans.3,839 npmMIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents and IDE assistants to run zero-config security audits, detect secrets and vulnerable dependencies, and apply adversarial verification to reduce false positives.2 npm1MIT
TDQS
B3.1/5.0
Scored across 163 tools
Disambiguation2/5
With 163 tools, many overlap in purpose: assess_model vs check_control_gaps vs get_risk_view vs get_verification_report, query_threat_model vs get_threat_model vs get_composition, and several quality/attestation tools. Descriptions help but an agent must reason across many similar reads, making misselection likely.
Naming Consistency4/5
Almost all names follow a snake_case verb_noun or noun_report pattern (e.g. get_controls, add_asset, submit_assertions, model_coherence_report). Minor deviations like set_control_objective_cal and get_findings_risks exist but the convention is readable and predictable.
Tool Count1/5
163 tools is extreme even for a rich threat-modeling platform; the surface is far beyond a well-scoped set. This volume guarantees discovery and selection burden for agents.
Completeness4/5
The surface covers generation, editing, assessment, evidence, compliance, composition, behavioural modeling, findings, and review workflows. A few lifecycle operations may be indirect (e.g. description edits via refine rather than direct update), but overall coverage is extensive.
Maintenance
ActivityActive
ResponsivenessNo issues