set_editor_install_path

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate non-readonly and non-destructive. The description adds the requirement for confirm=true but does not elaborate on the effect of setting the path, overwrite behavior, or potential side effects. With annotations present, the description adds marginal behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with two clauses, efficiently conveying the essential purpose and a key requirement. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple setter tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description covers the core function and a critical usage condition. It could be enhanced with error handling or confirmation flow details, but remains largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, so the description must compensate. It mentions 'Editor-Installationsverzeichnis' for path and 'confirm=true nötig' for confirm, but does not specify path format, allowed values, or behavior when confirm is false.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sets the editor install directory, with a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from siblings like get_editor_install_path (which gets the path) and set_default_project_dir (which sets a different path).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage when setting the install path and mentions 'confirm=true nötig' as a requirement, but it does not explicitly state when to use this tool vs alternatives or provide when-not conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.